We all sat around after our walk this morning trying to figure out what the guys on the U.S. Supreme Court could do to men in a manner as they have done to women in the Hobby Lobby case. We could not really come up with anything where they might deny insurance coverage in relations to men's reproductive functions. Nothing quite fit. Not one thing. If anyone thinks one up please comment.
2 comments:
Refusing to pay for vasectomies is the only hting which comes close.
What about refusing to recover penal implants or penal enhancement surgery?
Post a Comment