I read in Joe Monahan's blog that a Mayoral hopeful says the state of NM movers
and shakers need to grow the economy here to offset falling spending by the federal government and defense complex. Actually, the potential candidate has it all wrong. We should be moving to improve the private sector to offset a dying fossil fuel industry. Yes I mean oil, gas and coal.
Government spending will always be a part of NM. It is in less danger of a meltdown than anything. But as the global meeting on climate change progresses in Paris, the hand writing is on the wall for the dirty energy sector. Not tomorrow, or ten years, but certainly in our lifetimes that industry will mostly go the way of sailing ships, buggy whips, and VCRs. And so why blame government spending for being the bogey man on our future economic outlook? Because somebody has really not thought things through. And if they want the support of intelligent voters, they better start thinking harder.
and shakers need to grow the economy here to offset falling spending by the federal government and defense complex. Actually, the potential candidate has it all wrong. We should be moving to improve the private sector to offset a dying fossil fuel industry. Yes I mean oil, gas and coal.
Government spending will always be a part of NM. It is in less danger of a meltdown than anything. But as the global meeting on climate change progresses in Paris, the hand writing is on the wall for the dirty energy sector. Not tomorrow, or ten years, but certainly in our lifetimes that industry will mostly go the way of sailing ships, buggy whips, and VCRs. And so why blame government spending for being the bogey man on our future economic outlook? Because somebody has really not thought things through. And if they want the support of intelligent voters, they better start thinking harder.